Richard Roeper (Ebert & Roeper at the Movies) says "Cut the violent content!"
Richard Roeper recently came out in support of our efforts to protect children from violent content shown on publicly viewable in-flight films. "I have to agree," Roeper said in his TV commentary, "the content in (airline) movies is sometimes too violent." Roeper would prefer not to see legislation on this issue and instead has called on the Studios to "be more judicious in their editing," and to "cut the violent content." We couldn't agree more and welcome Mr. Roeper's support. Thank you!
2008 Update
We've been branded as an 'activist group' by CNN and others. With that in mind, we thought you might like to know some of the activities we've been involved in.
- Working behind the scenes with a range of groups to broker a long term plan which will keep adult passengers entertained, protect kids from harmful violent content, ensure a level playing field among airlines, provide true accountability, and eliminate the need for legislation.
- The groups we've been working with include The Airline Transport Association (ATA), The World Airline Entertainment Association (WAEA), the WAEA working group on Airline Films and The Family Friendly Flights Act, US Airways, Continental Airways, Congressman Heath Shuler, Senator Jay Rockefeller and the MPAA.
- We've also had courtesy conversations with four of the six major studios and have reached out to the rest of the major airlines, although without any interest on their part in speaking with us.
- Our great hope is that reason will prevail, that a solution will be quickly at hand and that we can avoid the need for legislation and/or a class action lawsuit.
Why This Website Exists
On a 2006 US Airways
flight, the in-flight airline movie screen dropped down from the
overhead and began showing images of incredible violence. A drive-by
shooting, a child crushed to death by a car, kids swapping guns.
And that was in the first five minutes of the film. What’s
crazy is that children on the flight were watching these images
regardless of whether or not their parents purchased headsets.
All because the screens were positioned so that everyone could
see them. On other more recent flights, parents have struggled to protect their
kids from images of murder, torture, melting faces and death – all
shown on publicly viewable screens.
The American Medical Association reports numerous studies which prove that exposure to violent images is harmful to children.
And yet, here in America, in the only situation in which parents are unable to walk away from a TV screen, change the channel or even turn the TV off, their kids are force fed images of horrific violence - against their will, against the recommendation of the Medical Experts and against the guidelines set by Hollywood as put forth by the MPAA.
Support for the Bi-Partisan
“Family
Friendly Flights Act”
The “Family Friendly Flights Act” was
introduced in the U.S. Congress on September 25th, 2007. This is
smart, common sense legislation which gives parents the ability
to protect their kids while respecting the First Amendment. While
our first choice is to see the airline industry self-regulate,
in the absence of concrete and accountable industry self-regulation,
we fully support the “Family Friendly Flights Act.” We
extend our thanks to Congressman Heath Shuler (D, NC) and Congressman
Walter Jones (R, NC), for co-authoring this Bill – as well
as to the many co-sponsors of the “Family Friendly Flights
Act” who
span both parties and the entire nation. Ultimately choice of when
and if a child should be exposed to images of murder, torture,
death and rape rated “PG-13” for violence or rated “R” is
one that should be made by parents, not airlines.
Read a draft of the legislation (pdf)
Current co-sponsors are:
1. Walter Jones (R-NC)
2. Joe Donnelly (D-IN)
3. David Price (D-NC)
4. Baron Hill (D-IN)
5. Dennis Cardoza (D-CA)
6. Zach Wamp (R-TN)
7. Mark Souder (R-IN)
8. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz (D-FL)
9. John Duncan (R-TN)
10. Mike McIntyre (D-NC)
11. John Barrow (D-GA)
12. Lincoln Davis, (D-TN)
13. Brad Miller, (D-NC)
14. Bart Gordon, (D-TN)
15. Dan Boren, (D-OK
16. Jo Ann Emerson, (R-MO)
17. Dave Weldon, (R-FL)
What Effect will the "Family
Friendly Flights Act" Have on Airlines and Airline Movies?
The
bill introduced in The U.S. House of Representatives in September
has no effect whatsoever on which films the airlines show on
personal screens. It also has no effect on the seating configuration
for planes that don't have publicly viewable (or overhead) screens.
Further, it has no impact on flights with overhead screens when the
films shown are rated G or PG and the television content is rated
TV-G. The FFFA does require airlines to create a section on the aircraft
where kids won't be exposed to the media content when there is a)
an overhead or publicly viewable screen and b) the film show is rated
PG-13 or R and/or the television content is rated TV-MA (for mature
audiences).
New York Times Front Page Story
The New York Times ran a front page article on 9/1/07
detailing the airline industry's move toward airing increasingly
violent films on publicly viewable overhead screens, now including "R"
rated films.
A Continental Airlines spokesman was quoted in the
NYT as saying:
"Parents have to be responsible for the actions
of their kids — whether they shouldn’t look at the
screen or look away."
"People love Pepsi, and we don’t serve
that, so there you go, we just ruined their flight. That’s
an accurate analogy.”
Read New York Times article >>
Common Misperceptions About Us
- We are not asking airlines to entertain our kids
and we are not asking airlines to air so much as a single children’s
movie
- There are plenty of adult-themed movies which do
not contain violent images which are perfectly suitable for publicly
viewable in-flight entertainment
- We are not concerned with violent films shown on
individual screens
- We are not collecting donations and we're not suing
the airlines.
FACTS
- Airlines ask Hollywood to edit films for nudity,
sex, obscene language and plane crashes. They are not concerned
about violence.
- Children under the age of six are incapable of
distinguishing between reality and make-believe, no matter how
carefully an adult attempts to explain the difference
- No government agency has regulatory authority over
in-flight entertainment – not DOT, FAA, FTC or FCC.
- Even though Airlines are now movie theaters, they
are not members of the MPAA and so they don’t follow MPAA
rating guidelines
– as a result, PG-13 films are being shown to children of
all ages on airline flights.
- The PG-13 rating was created in 1984 to allow teenagers
aged 14-17 to see films that without the PG-13 rating would have
been rated R.
- According to the MPAA: “A PG-13 film is one
which leaps beyond the boundaries of the PG rating in theme, violence,
nudity, sensuality, language, or other contents. Parents, by the
rating, are alerted to be very careful about the attendance of
their under-teenage children.”
- If a child-care facility aired these movies they
would face criminal and civil charges. Children simply should not
see these images.
- Parents can and do many things to entertain and
distract their kids on flights. That said, no one can tell a 3-year-old,
never mind an 11-year-old where to look. Even without purchasing
headsets, there is always the risk that a child will look up at
an inopportune moment and see images that even Hollywood agrees
they shouldn’t see.
- Unaccompanied minors don’t have the benefit
of a parent attempting to protect them from seeing these films
and, given that they’re traveling alone, are probably left
staring at the movie screens regardless of whether or not the flight
attendants give them a headset.
LINKS


For more information on the impact of entertainment
violence on children, read
this joint statement published and signed by the American Medical
Association, The American Academy of Pediatrics and others.
Also read
this article by the American Academy of Pediatrics on Media
Violence. |

“Violent
content should be trimmed a little more carefully from some
in-flight movies.”
- Richard Roeper, Ebert & Roeper
at the Movies
|

WE NEED YOUR
SIGNATURE
We are asking for your help. Please go to the
link and sign
our petition. You can also refer to the FAQ link for
answers to additional questions and/or email questions and
comments to us.
Jesse & Helen Kalisher
Contact:
(919) 967-4300, xt.21
|
Advisory Board
Dr. Laura Jana, M.D.
- Fellow, American Academy of Pediatrics
- Best-Selling Author: Heading Home With Your Newborn: From Birth
to Reality
- Co-Founder: The Dr. Spock Company
-
Dr. Victor Strasburger, M.D.
- Professor of Pediatrics, University of New Mexico
Dr. Katherine Frederick M.D.
- Fellow, American Academy of Pediatrics
- Practicing Pediatrician, Scarsdale, New York
|
THE FILMS
One or more of these films has appeared on publicly viewable screens
on United, US Air, Delta, American and Continental.
Shooter - R for Violence
Fracture - R for Violence
300 - R for Violence
Spider-Man 3 - PG-13 for Violence
X-Men, The Last Stand - PG-13 for Violence
Casino Royale - PG-13 for Violence
MI III - PG-13 for Violence
King Kong - PG-13 for Violence
Gridiron Gang - PG-13 for Violence
KID FRIENDLY AIRLINES
- Southwest - no films
- JetBlue - 100% individual screens
- Virgin Atlantic -
100% individual screens
"Parents may limit the choices children have in programming, plus a message warned all passengers to "shield your screen" to prevent children from accessing unsuitable content in-flight. "
|